User talk:Piotrus
![]() |
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above. |
---|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
---|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
---|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |

Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system

Lurking stats
[edit]Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
DYK for Found manuscript
[edit]On 8 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Found manuscript, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the trope of the found manuscript, in which a fictional work refers to another fictional work of literature, dates as far back as ancient Egypt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Found manuscript. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Found manuscript), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.