Talk:List of search engines
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of search engines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 October 2006. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2021
[edit]I just noticed that the limit for the free version of the Copernic Desktop Search is actually 25.000 files (see Copernic Search Soultion Comparaison) and not 10.000 files anymore.
Search Engine Backend
[edit]Shouldn't Brave's backend be Google? It appears their search backend is proxied to Google.Nightvour (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
banglasearchgpt.com can be added to the list for Bengali (বাংলা) language
[edit]A new RAG (retrieval augmented generation) based search engine based in bangla (bengali) language could be added in the country based list since it focuses mostly on the country Bangladesh. This is getting popular in Bangladesh. ProteekRoy (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2025
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the 4get metasearch engine 66.130.118.35 (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also there is no Wikipedia article, so notability is questionable at this stage. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
DuckDuckGo
[edit]The list gives the ownership of DuckDuckGo as "Multiple, including Microsoft Bing". No source is cited for this and the company insists that it is privately owned, and the ownership is not public knowledge. See [1] on the ownership and [2] on its connection with Bing. If there is no RS for Bing part ownership, this should be removed. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- List-Class Websites articles
- High-importance Websites articles
- List-Class Websites articles of High-importance
- List-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- List-Class Internet articles
- High-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- List-Class List articles
- Mid-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles