Talk:Children's Crusade
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Children's Crusade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Children's Crusade was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pied Piper
[edit]Would it be relevant to mention that some people cite the Children's Crusade as the source of the Pied Piper story?--BruceGrubb (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
- No. --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- What a boring and dismissive response to an interesting and plausible interpretation of the Pied Piper of Hamelin. No wonder Wikipedia is in a malaise. AndrewHart500 (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Issue with Sources
[edit]There were only 2 recent sources, and there are a couple of footnotes ("1" and "who") that need clarification. Some sources are missing too, unable to click on the link.
Brittn3 (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Removed sentence fragment
[edit]The following is the sentence fragment from the 'In the arts' section. "ger who seeks to reclaim the City of Jerusalem and sets out with his friends, and later with many other followers."Wzrd1 (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Cultural references
[edit]Per this community RfC, cultural references need to include secondary sourcing establishing not only the existence but the significance of the reference. At the moment the content below lacks such sourcing; it will need appropriate citations in order to be included. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's not "in popular culture" that's your interpretation. Sure sources can be added but that's no reason to immediately delete the entire section that has been in place for decades without complaint. That RfC is not a hard red line either every article has its own talk page and consensus. What's your rush? Slow down, your deleting stuff all over Wikipedia at a very rapid pace, sorry if this dispute slows you down some, that's just how it is not everyone will agree with you in every article. -- GreenC 04:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- If you believe it can be sourced, by all means source it. But being longstanding doesn't mean it should be restored unsourced. It certainly doesn't mean it cannot be tagged. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Longstanding is a type of consensus. Also that RfC is not very strong: old, not many attendees, many of the votes are nuanced, the closer did not incorporate many of the comments it's a simple close IMO. Something as far reaching as this should be codified in guidelines or policy and not for such massive deletions across all of Wikipedia. -- GreenC 04:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- "Longstanding" is no longer consensus once someone voices disagreement, and "longstanding" is not an exemption from the burden to provide sourcing. As to your concern about level of consensus: a community consensus is stronger than a local one, particularly one only assumed based on lack of complaint, but as it happens this consensus is indeed codified, in MOS:CULTURALREFS (which also notes that such content may have headings other than "in popular culture"). Nikkimaria (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Longstanding is a type of consensus. Also that RfC is not very strong: old, not many attendees, many of the votes are nuanced, the closer did not incorporate many of the comments it's a simple close IMO. Something as far reaching as this should be codified in guidelines or policy and not for such massive deletions across all of Wikipedia. -- GreenC 04:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- If you believe it can be sourced, by all means source it. But being longstanding doesn't mean it should be restored unsourced. It certainly doesn't mean it cannot be tagged. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
In the arts[edit]Many works of art reference the Children's Crusade; this list is focused on works that are set in Middle Ages and focus primarily on a re-telling of the events. For other uses see Children's Crusade (disambiguation). Books[edit]
Comics[edit]
Plays[edit]
Musicals[edit]
Music[edit]
Movies[edit]
|
- Delisted good articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class Middle Ages articles
- High-importance Middle Ages articles
- Start-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Medieval warfare articles
- Medieval warfare task force articles
- C-Class Crusades articles
- Crusades task force articles